Before applying the methodology to operational contexts, the team tested it on simulated ship trajectories where the “true” path was known. These simulations allowed them to tune key parameters—such as velocity limits and tolerance distances—and confirm that interpolation and prediction behaved as expected.

The study then moved into real sea trials in cooperation with the Greek Armed Forces. During these tests, vessels performed straight courses, sharp turns and avoidance manoeuvres, with their movements recorded and processed by the automated analysis system. While detailed scenarios remain confidential for national security reasons, the published results show that the method successfully handled demanding manoeuvres and produced reliable analyses across a wide range of speeds and headings.

This progression from controlled simulations to defence-supported trials is particularly relevant for UnderSec. It demonstrates that the tools developed for automated maritime movement analysis can operate under real-world conditions, supporting surveillance and decision-making in complex environments linked to underwater and subsea infrastructure protection.